Search This Blog

M F Hussain's Paintings.... Judge Yourself

This is the Mail being circulated for a while about M.F.Hussain's most controversial Paintings.
 Goddess Durga union with Tiger
 Full Clad Muslim King and naked Hindu Brahmin. The above painting clearly indicates Hussain ' s tendency to paint any Hindu as naked and thus his hatred..
  Goddess Lakshmi naked on Shree Ganesh ' s head
 Hussain ' s Daughter well clothed
 M.F. Hussain ' s Mother fully clothed
 Mother Teresa fully clothed
 Muslim poets Faiz, Galib are shown well-! clothed
 Naked Bharatmata - Hussain has shown naked woman with names of states written on different parts of her body. He has used Ashok Chakra, Tri-colour in the painting. By doing this he has violated law & hurt National Pride of Indians. Both these things should be of grave concern to every Indian irrespective of his religion.
 Naked Draupadi.
 Naked Lord Hanuman and Goddess Sita sitting on thigh of Ravana
 Naked Saraswati
 Naked Shri Parvati
 Prophet ' s Daughter Fatima fully clothed
Well cloth! ed Muslim Lady.
 Out of the four leaders M. Gandhi is decapitated and Hitler is naked. Hussain hates Hitler and has said in an interview 8 years ago that he has depicted Hitler naked to humiliate him and as he deserves it ! How come Hitler ' s nudity cause humiliation when in Hussain ' s own statement nudity in art depicts purity and is in fact an honour ! This shows Hussain ' s perversion and hypocrisy.  







Don ' t feel shy to Share.

Do U want to send more than 100 SMS to your friends?


Telecom service providers offer SMS packages offering as many as 2000 SMS per day, which can be made use of by unregistered persons for sending commercial communications from ordinary numbers. In order to reduce such a possibility, TRAI has, in consumer interest, prescribed a limit of 100 SMS per day per SIM for all the customers.


So, If you want to send as many SMS as you can to your Dear ones,
Contact And ask them to revert back things as they were before this stupid notice.


S.No Name and Designation Office Tele. No. EPABX No. FAX No. E Mail
1. Shri. R. K. Arnold
Secretary
23237448
23211847
201 23222816 secretary@trai.gov.in
2. Smt. Anuradha Mitra
Pr. Adv(Financial Analysis & Internal Finance Advice)
23221856 139 23235249 pradvfa@trai.gov.in
3. Shri Lav Gupta
Pr. Advisor (Technology & Development)
23216930 131 23235270 pradvtdra@trai.gov.in
4. Shri Parameswaran N
Pr. Advisor (Consumer Affairs & International Relation)
23233291 401 23235161 pradvre@trai.gov.in
5. Shri R.K. Mishra
Pr. Adv(Administration,Human Resource Management & Regulatory Enforcement)
23236119 209 23237923 rkmishra@trai.gov.in
6. Shri Sudhir Gupta
Pr. Advisor (Mobile Services)
23220018 171 23212014 pradvmn@trai.gov.in
7. Shri. A.Rober Jerad Ravi
Advisor (Quality of Services)
23230404 601 23213036 advqos@trai.gov.in
8. Shri Amit Mohan Govil
Advisor (Legal)
23231304 501 23211040 advlegal1@trai.gov.in
9. Shri Arvind Kumar
Advisor (Interconnection & Fixed Network)
23220209 103 23230056 advifn@trai.gov.in
10. Shri. K. J. S. Bains
Advisor (Legal)
23237024134 23211040 advlegal@trai.gov.in
11. Shri. Raj Pal
Advisor (Economic Regulation)
23230752 178 23236650 adveco@trai.gov.in
12. Shri Rajkumar Upadhyay
Adv (Broadband & Policy Analysis)
23220020 503 23211998 advbbpa@trai.gov.in
13. Shri Sanjeev Banzal
Advisor (Mobile Network)
23210481 173 23212014 advmn@trai.gov.in
14. Shri. Wasi Ahmad
Advisor (Broadcasting & Cable Services)
23237922 410 23220442 advbcs@trai.gov.in
List Updated on 28 September 2011





iCloud sues Apple over name

iCloud Communications, a Phoenix-based voice over IP provider, alleges that the name of Apple's recently announced online storage service copies its name and causes confusion over competing products:
The goods and services with which Apple intends to use the "iCloud" mark are identical to or closely related to the goods and services that have been offered by iCloud Communications under the iCloud Marks since its formation in 2005. However, due to the worldwide media coverage given to and generated by Apple's announcement of its "iCloud" services and the ensuing saturation advertising campaign pursued by Apple, the media and the general public have quickly come to associate the mark "iCloud" with Apple, rather than iCloud Communications. iCloud Communications claims "Apple has a long and well-known history of knowingly and willfully treading on the trademark rights of others," noting that the Cupertino, Calif., company has been sued by The Beatles over use of the Apple name, by Cisco Systems over use of the iPhone name, and by Terrytown over use of "Might Mouse." The lawsuit, which was filed Thursday in U.S. District Court of Arizona, seeks an injunction against Apple's use of the iCloud name, as well as an unspecified amount of monetary compensation.
For more on this story, read Apple sued over use of iCloud name on CNET News.

Sachin Tendulkar had claimed Rs 2,08,59,707!!!

An Income Tax tribunal has allowed ace cricketer Sachin Tendulkar to claim deductions from his taxable income pertaining to earnings from modelling in advertisements.
The tribunal noted that Tendulkar had received an amount of Rs 19,92,27,085 as gross receipts from sports sponsorship and advertisements, which included an amount of Rs 5,92,31,211 received in convertible foreign exchange from ESPN Star Sports, Pepsico Inc and VISA.

The cricketer had claimed deduction u/s 80 RR amounting to Rs 2,08,59,707 on account of receipt of Rs 5,92,31,211.

Income tax slabs 2011-2012 for General tax payers

Income tax slab (in Rs.)Tax
0 to 1,80,000No tax
1,80,001 to 5,00,00010%
5,00,001 to 8,00,00020%
Above 8,00,00030%

Income tax slabs 2011-2012 for Women

Income tax slab (in Rs.)Tax
0 to 1,90,000No tax
1,90,001 to 5,00,00010%
5,00,001 to 8,00,00020%
Above 8,00,00030%

Income tax slabs 2011-2012 for Senior citizen (Aged 60 years but less than 80 years)

Income tax slab (in Rs.)Tax
0 to 2,50,000No tax
2,50,001 to 5,00,00010%
5,00,001 to 8,00,00020%
Above 8,00,00030%

Income tax slabs 2011-2012 for Very Senior citizen (Above 80 years)

Income tax slab (in Rs.)Tax
0 to 5,00,0000%
5,00,001 to 8,00,00020%
Above 8,00,00030%

Income tax slab 2011-2012

Source

Here is the latest income tax slab rates for Year 2011-2012. This tax table based on the latest income tax slab is a ready reference for calculating your income tax for year 2011-12. Quick highlights
  • Base slab for general tax payers increased to 1.8 lakh from original 1.6 lakh
  • Senior citizen age reduced to 60 years from last years 65 years. Senior citizen now include people between 60 and 80 years. Also increased the base slab for senior citizen to 2.5 lakh from previous years 2.4 lakh
  • A new category called "Very Senior citizen" added for people above 80 years.
To find out how much is your savings due to the latest tax slabs, you can use our free income tax calculator to do a quick calculation. Click here

Income tax slabs 2011-2012 for General tax payers

Income tax slab (in Rs.)Tax
0 to 1,80,000No tax
1,80,001 to 5,00,00010%
5,00,001 to 8,00,00020%
Above 8,00,00030%

Income tax slabs 2011-2012 for Women

Income tax slab (in Rs.)Tax
0 to 1,90,000No tax
1,90,001 to 5,00,00010%
5,00,001 to 8,00,00020%
Above 8,00,00030%

Income tax slabs 2011-2012 for Senior citizen (Aged 60 years but less than 80 years)

Income tax slab (in Rs.)Tax
0 to 2,50,000No tax
2,50,001 to 5,00,00010%
5,00,001 to 8,00,00020%
Above 8,00,00030%

Income tax slabs 2011-2012 for Very Senior citizen (Above 80 years)

Income tax slab (in Rs.)Tax
0 to 5,00,0000%
5,00,001 to 8,00,00020%
Above 8,00,00030%

Tax relief for 'Actor' Tendulkar

Source


Tax relief for 'Actor' Tendulkar
Sachin Tendulkar pictured at a press conference of a bank © Getty Images
Mumbai: May 24, 2011

An Income Tax tribunal has allowed ace cricketer Sachin Tendulkar to claim deductions from his taxable income pertaining to earnings from modelling in advertisements.

The two-member tribunal, which gave its order on May 20, upheld the cricket legend's argument that he was an 'actor' while appearing in commercials.

Asha Vijayaraghavan, judicial member of the tribunal, and R K Panda, accountant member, gave the ruling on four appeals filed by the batting maestro against the verdict of Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for assessment years 2001-02 to 2004-2005.

Tendulkar argued that he had claimed deductions under Section 80 RR of I-T Act on the ground that he was an 'actor' while appearing in advertisements. He submitted that the CIT (A) had wrongly held that he was not an actor as cricket was his principal profession.

Tendulkar further argued that he was a cricketer and not a professional actor. He submitted his appearances in advertisements made him an actor and thus he was entitled to deductions. Moreover, he argued that such deductions had been allowed to him earlier.

He cited cases of popular figures like Amitabh Bachchan, Shah Rukh Khan, Tarun Tahilyani and Harsha Bhogale, who had also claimed deductions from their income through advertisements.

"We accordingly hold that the amount of Rs 5,92,31,211 received by the assessee amounts to income derived by the assessee in the exercise of his profession as an artist and therefore entitled to deduction u/s 80RR of the Act."

The tribunal noted that Tendulkar had received an amount of Rs 19,92,27,085 as gross receipts from sports sponsorship and advertisements, which included an amount of Rs 5,92,31,211 received in convertible foreign exchange from ESPN Star Sports, Pepsico Inc and VISA.

The cricketer had claimed deduction u/s 80 RR amounting to Rs 2,08,59,707 on account of receipt of Rs 5,92,31,211. 

© PTI